Pioneers Insight Method Research Author
Still Time To Be Bullish?
Back to Episodes

Still Time To Be Bullish?

Summary

  • Crypto’s maturation has replaced the reflexive three-week melt-up with a slower bull market in which patience is the edge. Jonah argues this could become a six- or seven-year “upwards kind of choppy grind,” while Avi contrasts today’s 5%-15% moves with BNB running from $35 to $400 in four weeks during 2021. Their shared instruction: build a thesis and “sort of sit in it.”

  • Digital-asset treasuries and underpriced corporate assets offer trades that may need weeks—not hours—to work. Avi bought SOL near $195 after hearing that roughly 80% of new treasury cash was, as far as he was hearing, earmarked for fresh SOL purchases, with about 20% reserved for locked supply; even after almost two weeks, the gain was only around 15%. He remains bullish on Galaxy because its AI data center may be mispriced, despite the stock moving from $30 to $22 and back near $27.

  • Neither host sees persuasive evidence that Bitcoin’s cycle has topped near $115,000. Avi says traders are pattern-matching the 2021 chart while ignoring higher realized purchase prices and an MVRV-Z score of only 2; Bitcoin is also just roughly 60% above its prior $70,000 high. Jonah concedes that his edge is holding mega-trends and buying macro dislocations—not selecting whichever altcoin pumps while BTC ranges between roughly $105,000 and $120,000.

  • PUMP is the episode’s clearest cash-flow trade, while BNB is a regulatory-access option. PUMP was generating roughly $1.3 million-$2.5 million of daily revenue, and Jonah estimated that about $1.5 million a day appeared to be going to buybacks—potentially $500 million-$600 million annually against a market cap below $2 billion. Avi sees BNB above $1,000 “in short order,” points to U.S. discussion of opening perpetuals to investors, and argues that moving the probability of U.S. access to Binance from 5% to 30% could justify an immediate 10%-20% rerating.

  • The structural bull case for gambling is the promise of life-changing upside from trivial starting capital. PUMP is “Vegas on chain,” with memecoins offering the emotional possibility of turning $350 into $50,000; Avi’s raffle example—150,000 tickets at $5 for a house, ultimately selling 200,000—shows the same mechanism spreading offline. Robinhood and PUMP are the proposed picks-and-shovels, especially if their social and product networks add more “games” to the casino.

  • Tron’s extraordinarily smooth appreciation may be tradeable, but Avi sees catastrophic conditional downside. Jonah provocatively frames TRX as a way to benefit from Tron’s entrenched market for no-KYC stablecoin transfers and argues that competition from Stable, Plasma and Tempo could force Justin Sun into aggressive price support. Avi’s warning is stark: TRX could see a 70%-90% drawdown—“probably more like a 95%”—if Bitcoin falls 30% for more than a few months.

  • Tokenized collectibles illustrate crypto’s more durable opportunity: turning illiquid, off-chain wealth into standardized, financeable markets. Avi highlights Collector Crypt’s CARDS token, which he says rose 10x in two weeks as its Pokémon-card marketplace gained revenue and attention. The larger thesis spans Pokémon cards, wine, Hot Wheels and long-dated prediction positions: tokenize ownership, improve pricing and liquidity, then enable borrowing against the assets.

Deep dive

1. Maturation has turned the bull market into a patience trade

  • Jonah’s opening thesis is that widespread adoption may produce a six- or seven-year “upwards kind of choppy grind,” not one final parabolic pump. Regulatory easing and institutional participation could “proliferate by osmosis” through crypto slowly, frustrating traders conditioned to instant multiples.

  • Avi’s comparison makes the regime change concrete: BNB climbed from roughly $35 to $400 in four weeks during 2021, whereas Hyperliquid needed months to recover from $9 to around $50. Today’s normal outcome is often a 5%-15% day, not “100% everybody crowds into the same coin for three weeks.”

  • His SOL trade was the specimen: after hearing that, as far as he was hearing, new digital-asset treasuries would direct roughly 80% of raised cash toward fresh market purchases and about 20% toward locked SOL, Avi went overweight near $195. The catalyst took almost two weeks to diffuse, produced only about 15%, and prompted him to remove most—but not all—of the tactical overweight.

  • Galaxy reinforces the same lesson. Avi remains bullish despite a $30-to-$22-to-$27 round trip because he thinks the market undervalues its AI data center and future contracts; similarly, HYPE sat around $40-$45 despite visible buybacks before advancing. “This is a market where you can actually invest.”

2. The cycle-top chart rhymes, but the ownership data does not

  • Jonah adds a third leg to Avi’s value-and-momentum framework: fundamentals. Value asks whether a two- or three-bagger is reasonable, momentum asks whether price is trending, and fundamentals provide observable evidence that can invalidate the trade rather than leaving investors dependent on narrative.

  • His candid portfolio review is useful: mostly BTC, some leveraged ETH and SOL, plus Aerodrome, with active trading confined to a small sleeve. A four-bagger in HYPE was the last large win; otherwise performance felt “kind of mediocre,” so he is leaning into his edge in mega-trends and macro-driven selloffs rather than forcing altcoin rotation.

  • Avi’s cycle-top rebuttal starts with valuation and ownership. At about $115,000, Bitcoin was only around 60% above 2021’s $70,000 high, while newer holders had already churned supply at much higher cost bases. With MVRV-Z at only 2, “the statistics just don’t tell me that we’re in for trouble.”

  • Avi’s book therefore concentrates on BTC plus ETH, SOL and BNB—the latter three benefiting from digital-asset-treasury narratives, with BNB also carrying regulatory optionality—alongside smaller SYRUP and HYPE positions. Jonah says he is looking for a 25%-40% return from his entry points on these trades before rotating proceeds back into Bitcoin.

3. Revenue, buybacks and access create the cleanest trades

  • Jonah’s PUMP dashboard showed roughly $1.3 million-$2.5 million of daily revenue from continued memecoin issuance. Buybacks appeared to be near $1.5 million a day, which would annualize to about $500 million-$600 million—substantial beside a market cap below $2 billion and an FDV around $5.5 billion; deteriorating daily revenue would provide a visible exit signal.

  • The business may offend crypto’s decentralization idealists, but Jonah’s framing is deliberately economic: “the slot machines at the Wynn Las Vegas on chain at a global scale.” Unlike a purely reflexive token, PUMP has revenue, buybacks, momentum and a measurable operating engine.

  • Avi’s BNB call is categorical but conditional: he sees “no reason why it shouldn’t go trade over $1,000” soon. He points to the U.S. government and CFTC saying they might open perpetuals to U.S. investors; separately, if the chance of U.S. investors accessing Binance rises from 5% to 30%, he thinks BNB should already be 10%-20% higher. He disclosed that the position is in his book.

  • Oracle’s 40% daily jump strengthened Avi’s Galaxy thesis and supplied a buyback analogy: Larry Ellison’s ownership reportedly rose from about 27% to 40% because he declined to sell into Oracle’s repurchases. Ripple equity, meanwhile, traded near $137 on secondary markets while Ripple offered a $250 buyback after earlier rounds around $60 and $80.

4. Ripple and Tron package opportunity with unusually opaque risks

  • Avi reads Ripple’s heavily subscribed, 5%-capped buybacks as insider confidence and infers that an IPO may be approaching—potentially constructive for XRP. Jonah’s sharper interpretation: Ripple’s principals are traders who may be repurchasing before selling equity to public-market investors, while holders accept because other liquidity is scarce.

  • Jonah calls TRX “the best Sharpe ratio I’ve seen in our space ever,” revisiting a token he had dismissed as a Justin Sun personality trade and a stablecoin “crime chain.” His speculative thesis is that Tron could retain a niche in no-KYC transfers that more regulated competitors will not serve as on-chain activity expands.

  • Jonah further argues that Stable, Plasma and Tempo are explicitly targeting Tron’s stablecoin market and could force Justin Sun into aggressive price support to keep Tron relevant. Avi’s pushback is the balance-sheet risk behind that smooth chart: price support may work during a bull market but fail in a prolonged drawdown. If BTC drops 30% for several months, he estimates TRX might lose 70%-90%, “probably more like a 95%”; at most, “could be a good punt.”

5. The on-chain casino wins by selling asymmetric dreams

  • Avi compares PUMP’s streaming and distribution network to Twitch: once creators and audiences congregate there, visibility becomes self-reinforcing. As long as the appetite to create and gamble on coins persists, he expects the incumbent to retain its lead, though Jonah flags the risk that a better launchpad offers a better product for more complex tokenomics or on-chain equities.

  • The product insight is that blackjack does not promise enough convexity. Memecoins capture attention because someone can plausibly imagine putting in $350 at a $100,000 market cap and leaving with $50,000; Jonah’s single lucky BODEN win was enough for even his mother-in-law to ask him to repeat it.

  • Avi’s house-raffle example broadens the thesis: a seller set a 150,000-ticket minimum at $5, then sold 200,000 tickets for a house he thought was probably worth about $500,000. Below the threshold, the owner would retain the house and split the raffle winnings with the winner—evidence that “gambling culture is not going away.”

  • Robinhood is Avi’s liquid-market expression of that culture, especially with a teased social feed that could place a WallStreetBets-like loop inside the brokerage. He sees another 30%-40% if crypto runs; Jonah thinks PUMP could expand beyond memecoin Ponzis into raffles, lotteries or other highly asymmetric products.

6. AI’s trough and tokenized collectibles create overlooked markets

  • Jonah treats AI’s cooling as a second-derivative setup. ChatGPT-5 was “not that much better” than ChatGPT-4o, so investors replaced parabolic forecasts with linear ones; he calls the resulting lull a possible “temporary trough in the AI bull run, a bear trap,” favoring overlooked on-chain and TradFi AI exposure.

  • Avi wants products with real usage, highlighting CARDS from Collector Crypt. He says the token rose 10x in two weeks as the heads-down team built a revenue-generating Pokémon-card marketplace where users verify physical cards, digitize ownership and trade them—an architecture that could extend to baseball cards and other collectibles.

  • Jonah initially objects that an NFT without the Marvel or Pokémon card itself is pointless. Avi’s correction carries the model: the buyer owns the underlying physical card; the tokenized rail standardizes pricing, comparison and liquidity. “It’s way better than eBay” because liquidity replaces fragmented listings.

  • Aerodrome expresses Avi’s broader bet on “new market creation”: prediction markets, memecoins and collectible markets could ultimately settle through AMMs. The end state is both tokenization and collateralization—borrowing against wine, Hot Wheels, Pokémon cards or three-year Polymarket positions—so value trapped in “weird places off-chain” becomes liquid and financeable.