Summary

The US economy is strong and inflation remains manageable; today’s “good news equals bad news” is a repricing for slower rate cuts, not a recession signal. NFP came in at 252k–256k (the figure may be revised), unemployment fell 15 basis points to 4.1%, and strong job openings pushed the 10-year Treasury yield toward 4.8%, while the S&P 500 pulled back roughly 3%–4% from its high. But a strong economy should lift corporate earnings, and the upcoming fourth-quarter results could once again support earnings-driven stocks.
The 10-year yield’s fair range is roughly 4.5%–4.7%; 4.8% is already excessive pricing, though CPI could still push it higher in the short term. The market is currently pricing about 0.5 rate cuts, or no more than one cut; the speaker believes hikes are off the table but still does not rule out 2 cuts this year. That leaves limited room for further bond shorts, with a rebound possible in February or after Trump takes office. “The first pothole may not be very big, but we should slow down.”
What truly hurts risk assets is not an absolute rate level but an extreme move in rates. A 2-standard-deviation move—say, a 5% shift—would statistically shock capital markets, hitting liquidity-sensitive assets such as unprofitable tech, Bitcoin and gold first, while profitable companies could rise alongside the economy and rates. Traditional post-pandemic risk parity has already broken down; “stocks stop rising when rates hit 5%” is simply not a rule.
The dollar’s strength is not yet fully priced, and the dominant 2025 trend may be continued dollar appreciation against the euro, yen and renminbi. The speaker expects the euro to “break 1 soon” and remain below parity for some time; unlike Treasury yields, which are close to topping out, “dollar pricing is only just beginning,” driven by the US advantages in growth, technology and capital inflows relative to other economies.
Global capital is continuing to allocate to US assets as technology, fiscal policy, the Fed put and deregulation work together. AI, profitable tech and cloud-capacity investment are concentrated in the US; fiscal deficits are likely to persist, while the Fed responds faster to downside risks than to upside inflation. The speaker says the capital-inflow trend that began in 2023 “has not changed,” resembling the long period when capital poured into China.
The biggest tail risk is not the current strength in the data but how Trump’s DOGE deficit cuts, immigration policy and tariffs are implemented after he takes office. The speaker assigns roughly a 30% probability to large-scale deficit reduction and mass layoffs, while becoming increasingly skeptical that Trump will pursue aggressive fiscal tightening; many policies may prove to be “more sound than substance.” If the economy then weakens, the market may initially trade “bad news equals good news,” but such rebounds typically have to “catch down” later.
The renminbi is more likely to be managed around 7.4–7.5 initially than immediately allowed to weaken, while FX-conversion controls will become increasingly strict. Even if the roughly $500B trade surplus has not translated into higher foreign-exchange reserves or greater Treasury holdings, authorities may continue spending resources to defend the currency; a sharp devaluation could also provoke retaliation from the US and Trump. The speaker’s base case is “defend it until it can’t be defended,” with a true release possibly coming within the next 1–2 years, though the timing remains uncertain.

Deep dive

1. Strong employment puts “good news equals bad news” front and center

The macro picture remained the core story last week: US rates rose rapidly as the dollar strengthened in tandem, a combination that is broadly toxic for risk assets. The S&P 500 pulled back roughly 3%–4% from its high, mainly reflecting an excessive rise in rates and the dollar rather than a sudden deterioration in the economy.
NFP came in at 252k–256k (the figure may be revised), well above the top line; unemployment was 4.1%, while ADP and job openings also pointed to a healthy economy. The speaker noted that post-pandemic employment-data volatility has widened from the previous range of tens of thousands to roughly 50k–100k. Individual prints may be revised, but the trend says “the US economy clearly has no problem.”
The market used to trade “bad news equals good news”: weak data brought forward rate-cut expectations and a brief rally, followed by a catch-down once the economy actually deteriorated. Now the opposite is happening—after Trump’s election, the market priced the recovery too early without simultaneously pricing higher rates and slower cuts, making strong data temporarily bad news.
Earnings will ultimately resolve the contradiction: fourth-quarter fundamentals look solid, and the earnings season about to begin will “most likely also be good.” The speaker’s causal chain is direct: “A strong economy lifts corporate earnings, and corporate earnings lift stock prices.”

2. The speed of the rate move is more dangerous than the 4.8% absolute level

For more than a year, the speaker had argued that long-end yields would struggle to fall and would continue rising. The view now is that the 10-year yield’s fair range is roughly 4.5%–4.7%, making 4.8% elevated. CPI could still drive a temporary spike, but the mean-reversion center has not disappeared.
The market is currently pricing about 0.5 rate cuts, or no more than one cut; the speaker believes hikes are off the table but still does not rule out 2 cuts this year. As long as 2025 hikes cannot be priced in—and Treasury supply in 2025 is somewhat better than in 2024—there is limited room to push bond prices lower, creating more incentive to buy the dip.
Absolute levels are not a mechanical ceiling for stocks: “Stocks stop rising when rates hit 5%—that does not exist.” Since the pandemic, higher rates have often signaled a stronger economy, allowing profitable companies to rise alongside rates. The assets that truly sell off are liquidity-dependent exposures such as unprofitable tech, gold and Bitcoin.
Both the speed and the extremity of the move need to be monitored. The speaker cited earlier analysis that a 2-standard-deviation rate move—for example, a 5% shift—would statistically shock capital markets. The current move has been fast enough to affect markets, but it is difficult to sustain the same pace of increase for long.

3. The first shock may bring a rebound; the real risk is economic weakness

On this week’s CPI, the speaker leans toward an in-line print: although the economy is strong, the lagged factors that pushed inflation higher last March are no longer present, so “I don’t think CPI will get very high or come in far above expectations.” The Fed will most likely not cut in March, with the next window potentially pushed to June or July.
Even if CPI runs high, pricing around 4.8% at the long end could still be excessive. The market could therefore rebound in the short term—for example, in February or after Trump takes office. That would not mean the tail risk had disappeared; it would simply mean this round of repricing around the FOMC and the rate path is “not very dangerous.”
The speaker described the market as entering a “muddy, pothole-ridden” road: the first pothole may not be deep, but investors should slow down because policy uncertainty remains high. Positioning should not be excessive, but there is also no reason to treat a strong economy itself as a crisis.
The real risk is a deterioration in the economic fundamentals. The market might initially resume trading “bad news equals good news” on renewed Fed cuts, but the speaker warned that such rallies usually still have to catch down later. The rate shock from current strong growth could also be offset by a market recovery driven by subsequent earnings growth.

4. Several forces continue pushing global capital toward the US

The first force is technology and capex: AI, high-quality profitable tech companies and cloud-capacity investment are concentrated primarily in the US. The speaker believes this combination will continue to attract global allocations, and the long-term trend of capital flowing into the US since 2023 is not over.
The second force is fiscal policy. The speaker assigns roughly a 30% probability to Trump using DOGE for large-scale deficit reduction and layoffs, but says he is “increasingly feeling that Trump may not be so aggressive about cutting the deficit.” The plan to raise the debt ceiling by $1.2T while reducing the deficit by $2.5T over the next 10 years has been stretched out, suggesting that fiscal tightening may be limited.
The third force is the Fed put, and the fourth is deregulation. The Fed will cut rates quickly when the economy deteriorates, but it is slower to turn hawkish and hike when the economy overheats or inflation rises; “its butt is sitting on the dovish side.” Trump and his team, including Elon Musk and Peter Thiel, clearly favor less regulation.
With these forces combined, the speaker compared today with the earlier flow of capital into China: “The way capital used to flow into China is exactly how it is flowing into the US now.” Unless a tail risk or black swan emerges—such as genuinely large-scale fiscal contraction—the baseline case for allocating to dollar assets remains intact.

5. The US and Japan are moving in the opposite policy direction from China and Europe

Since the pandemic, the divergence between the US and Japan on one side and China and Europe on the other has widened markedly. Japan has inflation and strong growth; the US is also growing strongly. Monetary policy in both countries is still catching up with growth or inflation, lagging the underlying economic shift.
That lag will create repeated bouts of volatility: markets will worry about Japanese hikes or slower US cuts, but the basic direction of risk assets remains higher because policy will not become truly aggressive, and the shift toward hawkishness will lag growth and inflation. “Whatever the central bank’s policy, its butt is sitting on the dovish side.”
China and Europe, by contrast, are using fiscal policy to catch up with deflation—and doing so even more slowly. Europe is constrained by legal requirements and eurozone fiscal limits; China has lower fiscal revenue and other state priorities, so fiscal policy is moving more slowly than deflation itself.
The asset-allocation conclusion is clear: European and Chinese assets are not long-term holdings. Each policy announcement may offer a trade, but investors should “get out quickly.” This does not deny the possibility of rebounds; it reflects the view that policy impulses are too weak to reverse the structural divergence with the US.

6. Treasury repricing is nearing its end; dollar repricing is just beginning

The dollar’s latest strength has been driven largely by rates, but the two markets are in different valuation states: long-end yields are close to excessive pricing, while the exchange rate has yet to fully reflect the US advantages in growth, technology, equities and capital inflows relative to the rest of the world. “Rate pricing is more or less at the end, but dollar pricing is only just beginning.”
The speaker expects the dollar to continue strengthening against the euro, yen and renminbi. The euro could “break 1 soon” and remain below parity for at least part of this year. Real money is also hedging the risk of further dollar strength—or reducing its short-dollar exposure—in hopes of capturing the uptrend: “I made money; I’d rather keep it in dollars.”
For the renminbi, the more likely near-term path is a controlled weakening toward 7.4–7.5 rather than an immediate release. The speaker noted that the roughly $500B trade surplus has not increased foreign-exchange reserves or Treasury holdings, suggesting it will be difficult to keep defending 7.2–7.3. At the same time, a sharp devaluation could invite US retaliation, including sanctions under Trump.
Authorities may therefore “hold it in” until the currency can no longer be defended, at which point they will let it go; in the meantime, FX-conversion controls will become increasingly strict. That point could arrive within the next 1–2 years, but the timing is uncertain. If the dollar is still in a strong cycle then, the ultimate destination for the renminbi will need to be reassessed.

98: 李开复 on Part of 01.AI Joining Alibaba: Only Big Tech Can Pursue Frontier-Scale Models Vol.152 Macro Talk 73 | Year-End Special: “How the World Got Here” Determines “Where We’re Going”