Pioneers Insight Method Research Author
Finding Crypto's Next Big Trade | 1000x
Back to Episodes

Finding Crypto's Next Big Trade | 1000x

Summary

  • The ETH ETF approval confirms a structurally bullish regime, but the speakers expect digestion before durable inflows. Jonah says his ETH thesis was a six-month play and that he assigned only roughly 20% probability to such a rapid outcome. Avi says fast-money de-risking, a failure to clear March highs, and a one-to-two-month wait for launch could still produce an 8% pullback or a month of chop. “It’s all just short-term noise.”
  • The approval matters more as evidence that Washington’s anti-crypto barrier is collapsing than as an immediate fund-flow event. Jonah argues a close election made antagonizing tens of millions of crypto holders irrational after Trump embraced the industry and Biden changed course. If regulatory clarity eventually lets institutions settle on-chain and tokens pass dollar or stablecoin revenue to holders, he sees a path back to “raging euphoria mode.”
  • Institutional demand cannot be cleanly front-run without knowing when it arrives, but spot-Bitcoin ETF demand is already observable. Avi says regulatory relief might compress an allocator’s three-year plan into one year without bringing purchases forward until January; premature positioning then becomes “stale longs” vulnerable to macro shocks. Jonah contrasts that with GBTC holdings leveling off while IBIT averaged roughly $50 million of daily inflows—a persistent bid that could keep a floor under BTC.
  • BTC, ETH, and Solana offer such strong benchmark risk/reward that most altcoins now face an unusually high burden of proof. Jonah sees little genuine traction across Aptos, Sui, Sei, Avalanche and other alternative platforms: they may deliver catalyst-driven trades, but “they’re not good investments, they’re just good trades.” Jonah’s preferred expression is to short a weak alt-L1 against ETH or BTC after a 15–20% idiosyncratic pump.
  • Robinhood may be an underappreciated listed proxy for meme-coin activity, while Coinbase’s deregulation trade has a less obvious second act. The cited Robinhood figure—$4.5 billion of meme-coin volume over two weeks, or about $321 million daily—could imply roughly $700,000 in daily revenue at a 20-basis-point take rate. Jonah worries mainstream flow could migrate from costly Coinbase trading into traditional exchanges; Avi counters that Robinhood gives brokerage-only investors direct meme beta.
  • Airdrops, unlocks, funding and relative-value dislocations offer better opportunities than marrying tokens. Jonah highlights an Arweave setup in which shorting AR futures before backwardation could capture the coming airdrop; Avi proposes using VC-unlock calendars to short structurally weak L1 pairs. Their governing psychology is “only two emotions: shame and regret”—shame from missing the winner, regret from buying the loser.
  • Near-term positioning should stay tactical because neither speaker sees an immediate crypto-native liftoff catalyst. Jonah was tactically short for a possible 5–6% decline ahead of PCE but ready to buy a broader risk selloff if favorable data created an upside surprise. His conditional macro bull case is weaker transportation-fuel prices leading to cooler inflation, rate cuts into the election, and eventually overheating assets; until then, “this is where discipline comes in.”

Deep dive

1. ETH’s fast win created a pause, not a broken thesis

  • Jonah’s victory lap came with an important admission: he expected his ETH thesis to take six months and put only about 20% odds on a rapid resolution. The lesson was to own assets whose response to a catalyst is knowable even when its timing is not: “It’s just good to own.”

  • The uncomfortable chart read remained intact. ETH ripped on approval but stalled below its March highs; traders positioned for a quick flip began selling, and actual ETF inflows might not arrive for one or two months because the product was not yet live. Avi allowed for an 8% decline while calling it “short-term noise.”

  • Jonah had originally wanted apathy and inertia to deliver $55,000 Bitcoin, but the political shift made him doubt that entry would appear. Avi instead described a possible floor as buyers who would previously have stayed out during a major selloff become more comfortable stepping in.

  • The near-term synthesis was narrower than outright euphoria: BTC and ETH positions became easier to hold, a fall toward $52,000 looked less likely to Avi, and a month of range trading remained plausible. His harder deadline was year-end: “If you’re not positioned by the end of the year, you probably should be.”

2. Washington changed the destination before it changed the timetable

  • Jonah’s framing: ETH approval revealed the “why” behind the market move. With tens of millions of Americans holding crypto and a few counties or roughly 20,000 votes potentially deciding an election, turning them into single-issue opponents made little political sense.

  • Trump’s vocal support, including his Mar-a-Lago crypto dinner, forced the issue; Biden then reversed course rather than “die on that hill.” Jonah interpreted the result as removal of the Elizabeth Warren–Gary Gensler anti-crypto obstacle, allowing institutions to become more comfortable with on-chain activity beyond their existing comfort with Bitcoin and ETH.

  • His longer chain runs from custody and regulatory clarity to institutional on-chain settlement, then to companies issuing tokens and passing dollar or stablecoin revenue to holders much as equities distribute dividends. That endpoint—not one ETF candle—is why he entertained “raging euphoria mode again in crypto.”

  • Avi’s pushback—worth keeping: large banks, pension funds and other allocators remain slow even after the policy risk falls. Clarity could shorten a three-year roadmap to one year, but teams may only now begin assigning resources and probably will not allocate until January.

3. Only flows with visible timing can be front-run

  • Avi calls premature institutional positioning “stale longs.” An allocator’s eventual purchase cannot protect a trade from deteriorating macro, disappearing liquidity or a crypto-wide selloff today; if the distant catalyst cannot justify holding through those risks, the position gets liquidated first.

  • His analogy was a prominent buyer tweeting, “In one year I might buy some of this coin.” The name can generate a 20% pump, but without an actual order the move retraces. Good future news is not equivalent to present demand.

  • Jonah connected that problem to institutional dealing desks. Historically, salespeople used frantic hand signals to tip traders toward buying or selling before a client’s oil hedge; tighter information flows, regulation and faster markets eventually made that behavior both constrained and unprofitable. “Front-running only works if there’s going to be a big flow and you know exactly when it’s hitting.”

  • The observable exception was spot-Bitcoin ETF demand: GBTC holdings had leveled off while IBIT was averaging about $50 million of daily inflows. Jonah thought that steady bid, combined with the halving and political sentiment shift, could prevent his desired dip and support a gradually stronger second half.

4. Listed equities may carry cleaner crypto beta than marginal tokens

  • Avi posed the portfolio problem as a structure question: with a floor but uncertain timing, should investors sell cash-backed puts at levels where they want BTC or ETH, or sell volatility against an expected range? The premise was accumulation—not pretending $100,000 BTC would arrive “in three seconds.”

  • Jonah saw Coinbase as the obvious first beneficiary of deregulation, then “mid-curved” himself. Coinbase is expensive to trade on, and if mainstream crypto flow migrates into products such as IBIT on the New York Stock Exchange, easier access could cannibalize part of its business. His deliberately contrarian “horse trade” was Coinbase puts.

  • Avi’s alternative was Robinhood. Robinhood reportedly handled $4.5 billion of meme-coin volume in two weeks—about $321 million daily. Grok claimed the platform offered Dogecoin, Shiba Inu, WIF, BONK, Pepe and Floki, though the speakers questioned whether Grok was accurate. For brokerage-bound investors, Robinhood could act as a meme-coin proxy.

  • Jonah estimated Robinhood once earned 35 basis points per traded dollar and thought it had since reduced that toward 20; if volume was roughly $350 million daily, memes alone could generate about $700,000 of revenue. The behavioral evidence matched it: younger commodity traders he knows held around 30% of net worth in leveraged crypto because they saw no route to financial freedom through traditional stocks and bonds.

5. Alt-L1 decay is more compelling as a pair than a short

  • The emotional trap was captured through Søren Kierkegaard: marry and regret it; do not marry and regret that too. Jonah’s natural-gas mentor translated it into trading’s “only two emotions: shame and regret”—shame when a rally is missed, regret when the wrong asset destroys capital.

  • Jonah saw scant activity outside ETH, Solana, Arbitrum and Optimism. Last cycle’s alternative platforms could sustain a façade through partnerships and cloned applications; now Aptos, Sui, Sei, Avalanche and others attracted little widely recognized or widely cared-about work. A fivefold volume jump without equivalent price appreciation might still be buyable, but only as a trade.

  • Avi explained why dead ecosystems can keep rising with benchmarks: mid-frequency correlation algorithms buy an unchanged alt when ETH ticks higher. Beneath that mechanical correlation, ETH or Solana has developers and new users while weaker chains have VC unlocks and selling, creating smooth declines in pairs such as Polkadot/ETH or NEAR/ETH.

  • Their practical entry was not to chase already-collapsed shorts. Jonah suggested waiting for a 15–20% “scam pump,” while also screening each token against its three closest correlations for moves around two standard deviations from the normal spread; because these pairs often mean-revert, that can offer a trade. VC-unlock calendars add timing; locked holders in old SAFTs may be “crossing off days” until they can redeploy.

6. Catalysts can be harvested without becoming investments

  • Jonah’s airdrop setup was Arweave: short AR futures before they entered backwardation, effectively getting the coming airdrop. If the future moved into backwardation, he could buy it back profitably and then potentially short the perpetual.

  • The Friend.tech discussion began with Jonah’s worry that it followed the familiar arc of brief popularity, renewed farming around an airdrop, then death. The subsequent response pushed back that few crypto-native social products had reached comparable prominence and gave the project credit for being a genuine social platform, while conceding the practical objective was finding a way “to pump their token.”

  • The Musk–Trump report produced another highly conditional trade: if their crypto-policy collaboration was real, own more Dogecoin and consider the possibility of a DOGE ETF. Musk’s retraction left neither speaker confident about which claim was true; the call never escaped that uncertainty.

  • NFTs supplied Avi’s warning against assuming every crypto category returns each cycle. He still believed NFTs might skip a cycle and recover later in the decade, but the BTC/BAYC pair being “up-only” showed how badly opportunity cost can compound. Every speculative holding is effectively a pair against the benchmark that could have held the capital.

  • The resulting playbook was active rather than devotional: Avi urged trading catalysts, shorting weak pairs, yield-farming, and collecting perp funding against spot. Jonah was tactically short for a possible 5–6% move ahead of PCE; his macro bull case involved falling oil and transportation fuels producing cooler CPI, rate cuts and overheated assets. Until then, Avi saw no real long-term investment thesis beyond the benchmarks.