Summary

Avi remains as bullish as ever, while Jonah’s Bitcoin base case is another couple of weeks around $60K-$65K, followed by a move through $70K when expected allocations arrive. Jonah reads the plunge to $50K as a technical chain—yen carry unwind, Nasdaq weakness, then Bitcoin liquidation—not “overwhelming weakness.” With fewer weak hands waiting to exit at $70K, that would set up a “very, very, very bullish Q4.”
The supply thesis rests on rising holder cost bases, not the disappearance of every government seller. Jonah said buyers from the $30Ks and $40Ks once targeted $70K; after profit-taking, panic exits, and higher re-entry prices, targets are shifting toward $100K-$150K. His inference: “every day that goes by, people are less likely to sell $70K.”
Avi’s answer to the range is disciplined inactivity because he trusts the breakout direction but not its timing. He remains fully engaged yet avoids churning positions, realizing taxable gains, or missing the eventual rally: “I’m just trying to remain disciplined and do nothing.” Jonah’s trading process adds that the relevant benchmark is not nominal profit but whether trading beats simply holding Bitcoin.
Pavel Durov’s arrest was framed as both a near-term TON risk and a forceful advertisement for decentralized social infrastructure. Jonah argued that it could “light a fire under the ass” of the TON Foundation, while concentrated holders may still sell a rebound toward $66.50. His one-year view was higher, but Avi warned that TON must outperform BTC, ETH, and SOL—not merely finish up 10%.
Jonah still sees ETH as “the XRP of this cycle,” with useful financial activity failing to translate into a compelling ETH-specific bid. Avi defended permissionless yield—especially stablecoin holders in roughly 150 emerging economies earning about 5%—and argued that this service is valuable. Jonah agreed it was valuable but said it was not an argument for ETH; Avi maintained that the activity could run more easily on Solana and that Ethereum lacks coordinated business development.
The proposed relative-value trade is to remain short ETH/BTC on bounces until a visible catalyst changes the flow. Avi proposed the trade and Jonah agreed it was probably the way to play it. Jonah expected ETH/BTC to remain weak over the next month because “the trend is your friend,” although ETH could later outperform SOL. The reversal catalyst would resemble a Saylor or Larry Fink repeatedly making Ethereum an institutional balance-sheet story.
Thin-market execution and honest performance attribution mattered more than finding another low-cap ticker. Avi prefers concealed sweeps to visible limit orders; Jonah warned that 3%-5% execution costs each way can destroy a 20% target and raised the “painting the tape” concern before accepting the distinction for genuine accumulation. Jonah favored majors over memes for now, and his trading journal records every decision so he cannot keep believing “this time will be different.”

Deep dive

1. Bitcoin’s range remains a launchpad for the next allocation wave

A live poll left “up” and “down” within the margin of error for September. Avi found that absence of consensus bullish; Jonah likewise expected the next break upward, even while acknowledging that September has often been difficult for Bitcoin.
Jonah reconstructed the fall from above $60K to $50K as a yen carry unwind that pulled down Nasdaq and then Bitcoin. The rebound to $65K supported his contention that the move was technical, rather than evidence of “overwhelming weakness in the market.”
Jonah’s near-term map allowed another two weeks between $61K and $65K, perhaps $60K-$65K. The expected allocation wave would then take Bitcoin toward $70K, where reduced weak-hand supply could produce a “very, very, very bullish Q4”; possible government sales remain, so the overall overhang has not vanished entirely.
Jonah’s cost-basis logic carried the supply call: holders who bought in the $30Ks-$40Ks often targeted $70K, but profit-taking, panic selling, and higher re-entry prices have pushed perceived targets toward $100K-$150K. Avi’s response was to remain engaged but disciplined and “do nothing,” rather than pretend he could time the break.

2. Durov’s arrest strengthens the case for decentralized social

Jonah said the arrest was disturbing because it pushed software builders closer to liability for what users do on their platforms. He inferred that Durov may not have cooperated with the investigation, unlike Facebook and other platforms that presumably do. Avi noted that Telegram is not encrypted by default and that its association with scammers and bad activity taints crypto’s reputation.
Avi’s architectural answer was portable identity, followers, contacts, and messages on a decentralized back end, with replaceable front ends and device-held data. If an app is shut down, users should not lose the community they built: that is “really the beauty of decentralized platforms.”
Jonah called this Durov’s “second rug pull,” recalling from Durov’s Tucker Carlson interview how control of VKontakte was previously taken from him. He speculated that losing another “baby” might push Durov toward a permanent, on-chain chat system that resists shutdown.
Jonah stressed that Telegram’s roughly 30-person app organization, the TON Foundation, and the TON blockchain are separate despite their relationship. Avi described TON falling from about $7 to $5 before rebounding; Jonah said concentrated holders may sell if it returns to $66.50, but expected better distribution and potentially a higher price in a year.

3. Ethereum’s useful finance still lacks an ETH-specific growth engine

Jonah repeated his earlier call that “ETH is going to be the XRP of this cycle,” made when ETH/BTC was around 0.55. Avi pushed back with applications on L2s and Base, including Polymarket; Jonah countered that Polymarket is on Polygon, may move, and could be built anywhere. Avi also cited activity involving memes on Base.
Avi rejected Vitalik’s characterization of DeFi as an ouroboros, “a snake that eats its tail.” Traditional finance is also a circular pipeline of lending and capital; permissionless stablecoin yield lets people in roughly 150 emerging economies store money on-chain despite relatively uninvestable local currencies and earn about 5%, in line with T-bills.
Jonah said Vitalik’s critique reflected the 2020 era of Ponzi-like yield games, which no longer attract the same activity. Avi conceded that the use case is valuable but separated that social value from ETH value; Jonah said the same activity could occur more easily on Solana in his view.

4. ETH/BTC stays shortable until institutions manufacture a catalyst

Jonah’s coexistence case was institutional conservatism: BlackRock chose Ethereum for its tokenization fund, and a manager seeking the longest operating history could select ETH without getting fired. Solana is faster and more performant but, in Jonah’s phrasing, “breaks more”; ledger-intensive applications may still prefer it as the chain matures.
Avi’s rebuttal was that deciding to enter crypto represents “95% of the discussion,” while choosing ETH versus SOL is only the remaining 5%. Solana also has institutional backers and more centralized business development; Ethereum itself has little BD, while L2s pursue customers without necessarily returning fees to mainnet.
On the actual trade, Jonah expected ETH/BTC lower over the next month because “the trend is your friend.” Avi proposed staying short on bounces and using the position as a hedge; Jonah agreed that was probably the way to play it, while cautioning that attentive traders would probably have time to flip before a catalyst made the move violent.
The missing catalyst was personified by Avi as “a Saylor” for ETH—or Larry Fink declaring that Ethereum would replace his back office and repeating the argument on CNBC. Avi also said capital inflows remain limited until the SEC allows structures such as tokenized equity and dividends; Jonah preferred armies of smaller buyers because they are easier to sell to directly.

5. Illiquid markets reward execution more than ticker discovery

With traditional-market liquidity at its seasonal low, Jonah said Bitcoin itself was trading “like an illiquid shitcoin.” For low-cap assets, 3%-5% execution costs each way can wreck a strategy targeting only 20%; Jonah trades directly on exchanges and considered professional execution tooling worthwhile at more than $1M in volume, even over a six-month period.
Avi prefers occasional market sweeps because a visible limit bid broadcasts intent, especially when the only background activity is “market maker on market maker violence.” Jonah initially heard a compliance officer warning that price-spiking orders resemble “painting the tape,” then accepted Avi’s distinction that genuine accumulation can use a different order pattern to attract sellers.
Near-term catalysts included Solana Breakpoint, Stacks’ Nakamoto upgrade, and Aptos activity around Korean Blockchain Week—summed up jokingly as “one APT equals one apartment.” Jonah’s broader assessment was blunt: only a few assets will become useful; most exist “to trade them and make money,” then may approach zero over three years.
Jonah was completely flat memecoins because Pump.fun keeps expanding supply while no catalyst forces demand into WIF, MOG, or similar names. His sequence is majors first: memes will likely be “the last thing to rally” after a substantial Bitcoin or Solana move, making the majors safer during the autumn chop.

6. A trading journal must prove skill against simply holding Bitcoin

Jonah writes down every decision and its rationale, then reviews the record at least weekly. His tagged trade blotter separates event trades, product launches, unlocks, flows, and relative-value positions, turning vague confidence into evidence about what he is actually good or bad at trading.
The system’s purpose is behavioral: once the data identifies a weakness, stop repeating it. Jonah has watched traders acknowledge a year of failure in one setup and still insist, “this time will be different,” because they never converted reflection into enforceable rules.
Jonah added the essential attribution test. Traders can mistake market-making or operating-business income for prop-trading skill; crypto traders can churn through a Bitcoin doubling, make 10%, incur taxes, and still feel successful. Performance must be measured against holding BTC and doing nothing—otherwise the activity may be destroying both capital and time.

Why Is Crypto Dumping? | 1000x Live Finding Crypto's Next Big Trade | 1000x